نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشکدۀ الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشکدۀ الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران؛ استاد مدعو دانشگاه بزرگمهر قائنات.
3 پسادکتری علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشکدۀ الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The noble Ḥadīth al-Thaqalayn, serving as a strategic charter within the epistemic geometry of Islam, is transmitted in Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim-considered the most authoritative traditionary source in Sunni Islam after Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī-via a variant narration on the authority of Zayd ibn Arqam. A critical analysis and comparative evaluation of this transmission against other authentic corpora of the two sects (farīqayn), alongside the analysis of internal and external contextual clues, indicates the occurrence of "systematic excision" within its text. The fundamental problem of this research is to substantiate the omission of the tradition’s strategic proposition, namely, the Prophet’s (PBUH) explicit declaration regarding the "non-separation of the Quran and the ʿItrah until the Pool of Kawthar", in the narration of Muslim Nīshābūrī. This deficiency fundamentally challenges the authoritativeness (ḥujjiyyah) and definitive attribution of this version to the Prophet (PBUH). Utilizing a descriptive-analytical method and a critical approach, this paper identifies the original text of this mutawātir (successively transmitted) tradition and proceeds with the deconstruction of erroneous interpretations predicated upon this abridged narration. The findings demonstrate that unconditional reliance on Muslim’s excised narration has facilitated reductionist readings that deny the tradition's implication for Imāmah and potentially undermine the intellectual and political authority of the Ahl al-Bayt (PBUT) within the Islamic thought system.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)