نوع مقاله : علمی ترویجی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه عدالت، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشجوی دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
When two jurisprudential narrations conflict and no customary reconciliation (Jamʿ-e ʿUrfī) is possible, the narration with preference is to be chosen. One of the established textual criteria (Murajjihāt-e Manṣūṣeh) in the chapter of conflict is "opposition to the public" (Mukhālafat maʿa al-ʿĀmmah), as a narration that aligns with the public is likely issued out of precautionary dissimulation, whereas the opposing narration was issued to clarify the divine ruling. However, the interpretation of "the public" (al-ʿĀmmah) varies among Uṣūlī scholars: some consider it the four Sunni schools of jurisprudence, others the oppressive rulers or judges, and still others attribute it to Abū Ḥanīfah or his legal opinions. In this research, through an analysis of narrative and historical data, the theory that "the public" refers to Abū Ḥanīfah himself is critically examined. The most significant critique of this criterion is the weakness of the scholarly evidence supporting the influence of Abū Ḥanīfah's fatwas during his lifetime, as well as the unreliability of claims regarding his deliberate opposition to Imam Ṣādiq (pbuh). Furthermore, considering Abū Ḥanīfah's historical context—including his intellectual openness, his special respect for the Prophet's family (especially Imam Ṣādiq), and his non-cooperation with certain rulers of his time—this theory lacks scholarly validity. The research findings help jurists gain greater awareness, enabling more precise analysis and better-reasoned conclusions when dealing with conflicting narrations. Additionally, this study emphasizes the necessity of reassessing the criteria for preference and conducting a more comprehensive analysis of Uṣūlī approaches.
کلیدواژهها [English]