نوع مقاله : علمی ترویجی
نویسنده
دانشآموختۀ کارشناسی علوم قرآنی و حدیث، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
One of the recurring themes used to cast doubt upon Islam is a discriminatory gender-based perspective within legal rulings and the alleged oppression of women compared to men in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). Among the traditions exploited through such misunderstandings is a narration found in the book Miṣbāḥ al-Anwār. Based on this ḥadīth, the critic claims that since Lady Fatimah (PBUH) was exempt from the female cycle and thus titled "al-Ṭāhirah" (the Pure), other women who experience menstruation are considered impure from the perspective of Islam; furthermore, it is claimed that the rulings pertaining to menstruation arise from this very perception of women. Prior to this study, no independent work has been authored specifically regarding the aforementioned ḥadīth with the aim of addressing this ambiguity. Consequently, the present article utilizes a descriptive-analytical method, citing authoritative sources in ḥadīth, rijāl, fiqh, and literature to conduct a rigorous analysis. After substantiating the weakness of the chain of transmission (isnād), the study proves the fallacy of the critic's interpretation. By examining specific rights and jurisprudential rulings related to women, it demonstrates that these laws are predicated upon the observance of women's material and spiritual interests, serving as an indication of the absence of gender discrimination within the Islamic legal system.
کلیدواژهها [English]
قرآن کریم.
)